|
Goodness
Good is a word we use to compliment things that we desire.
Suppose you say, “It’s raining.” I might respond, “That’s good,”
if we really needed the rain, or “That’s bad,” if we are having a lot of
flooding. Sometimes we say that something is “good for” something else if it
leads to something we think is good. We may like the first thing or not, as
when we are told, “This is good for you,” and the implication is that you may
not like this, but that it is worth it for the good it will bring.
So we use the word good for things that we desire in
themselves or that we desire because they lead to something else that we
desire. Why then does “good” sometimes have the connotation of something that
is going to ruin a “good time”? Because we have conflicting desires. On the one
hand we may want to have the good time, but we may also be fearful (or our
parent’s may be fearful) of the possible consequences, which we don’t want.
Each of us has our inventory of, often contradictory,
desires. Some of the desires are basic, such as the desire for survival. Others
are derived. Part of our struggle in life is to sort through our conflicting desires
to determine what is really in our “best interests”.
This leads into a natural conflict between our interests and
the interests of others. We consider someone selfish if they only consider
their own interests, and we consider someone a “good person” if they are
concerned about the interests of others. If they take this to an extreme so
that their own most basic interests are threatened, we may consider them a
hero, a saint, or a fool depending on the circumstances.
All of these uses of the word good seem to resolve to desire
in one form or another. Something may be good in one circumstance but not in
another, or to one person and not to another. There are goods that many of us
do agree on. But still this all seems to provide a very unstable definition for
good. How do we know what to seek when good is such a shifting sand? Isn’t
there an ultimate good that can provide a firm foundation?
But how would we find this ultimate good? We could list out
all of the goods we know about and try to arrange them in a hierarchy, then
pick the highest. But wouldn’t this hierarchy vary from person to person or
culture to culture? There does not appear to be any object in the world of
experience which is “the good”. Good is an evaluation we make of such objects.
So where does that leave us? Back with desire.
All of this doesn’t mean that we are on the brink of chaos
though. There are in fact many desires that most people agree on. Otherwise we
would not have survived as a society or as a species. For example, most of us
want to survive, to have a few enjoyments in life, and to be a part of a group,
to have friends, be a member of a family, to belong. These basic desires give
us enough in common with others so that we are often in agreement with what is
good with members of the social groups we belong to. Most people are more than
willing to allow others these basic goods within a system in which they can
also enjoy them.
|